Legal Opinion

Carrington v. Rash

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 1, 1965No. 82PublishedCited by 735 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stewart

A provision of the Texas Constitution prohibits “[a]ny member of the Armed Forces of the United States” who moves his home to Texas during the course of his military duty from ever voting in any election in that State “so long as he or she is a member of the Armed Forces.” 1 *90The question presented is whether this provision, as construed by the Supreme Court of Texas in the present case,2 deprives the petitioner of a right secured by the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Supreme Court of Texas decided that it does not and refused to issue a writ of mandamus ordering…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. United States v. ClassicSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Schneider v. State (Town of Irvington)Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  4. McLaughlin v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Gray v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by735 opinions

  1. Stanley v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Williams v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  5. Frontiero v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

730 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API