Legal Opinion

Department of Land Conservation & Development v. City of St. Helens

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 13, 1995No. LUBA No. 94-029; LUBA No. 94-030; CA A89817PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.

The City of St. Helens annexed a parcel of property that lies approximately 1,500 feet outside the city limits, but is within the city’s urban growth boundary (UGB). Simultaneously, the city annexed a 1,500-foot stretch of public road, which is also within the UGB and which connects the “target property” to the city, and made related land use decisions to advance the possible eventual use of the property for a Wal-Mart store. The Warren Neighborhood Association (respondent) and others1 appealed the city’s annexation and other decisions to LUBA. Although LUBA remanded the decisions on several…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. City of EstacadaOregon Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Marion County Fire District 1 v. Marion-Polk County Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
  3. Rivergate Residents Ass'n v. Portland Metropolitan Area Local Government Boundary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Morsman v. City of MadrasCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API