Hopkinson v. State
Wyoming Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
THOMAS, Chief Justice.
The Court having considered Petitioner’s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus finds that it should be denied for the following reasons:
1. This Court has decided the question of whether Petitioner could be charged and tried as a principal in Wyoming for accessorial acts taking place in another state. Hopkinson v. State, Wyo., 632 P.2d 79, 97-100 (1981), cert. denied 455 U.S. 922, 102 S.Ct. 1280, 71 L.Ed.2d 463 (1982) (Hopkinson I). In use of the word “overboard” the Court was referring to dicta, of Goldsmith v. Cheney, Wyo.,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Caldwell v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hopkinson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
- Hopkinson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1983
- State Ex Rel. Hopkinson v. District Court, Teton CountyWyoming Supreme Court · 1985
- Goldsmith v. CheneyWyoming Supreme Court · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Mark A. Hopkinson v. Duane Shillinger, and the Attorney General of the State of WyomingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Mark A. Hopkinson v. Duane Shillinger, and the Attorney General of the State of WyomingCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Rios v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1987
- Hopkinson v. ShillingerDistrict Court, D. Wyoming · 1986
- Hopkinson v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.