Legal Opinion

McCarty v. State

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided October 25, 1994No. 93-147PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TAYLOR, Justice.

Appellant contends the district court erred when it accepted his guilty plea to a charge of aggravated assault and battery without following the requirements of the Wyoming Rules of Criminal Procedure. Appellant also argues the district court abused its discretion in failing to grant a motion to withdraw his guilty plea prior to sentencing. On other matters, appellant claims the district court erred in denying a motion for appointment of substitute counsel and failed to grant adequate credit for time served in presentence incarceration.

We affirm.

I. ISSUES

Appellant submits…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. Godinez v. MoranSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  4. Henderson v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Parke v. RaleySupreme Court of the United States · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Reyna v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Major v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Van Haele v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Follett v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2006
  5. Becker v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API