Application of Jean Clement Louis Fouche
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LANE, Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals affirming the rejection of claims 1-3 in appellant’s application serial No. 463,-936, filed June 14, 1965, for “Dibenzocy-eloheptadiene Derivatives.” No claims have been allowed. We affirm as to claim 1 and reverse as to claims 2 and 3.
The invention claimed is a class of compounds having pharmaceutical utility due to their antidepressant, neuroleptic and tranquilizing properties. Claim 3 is illustrative of the appealed claims since it is drawn to the compound closest to the prior art of all the compounds within…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Application of Walter L. Borkowski and John J. Van VenrooyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Application of Alfred Marzocchi and Richard C. HortonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Application of Alexander D. Argoudelis, Clarence De Boer, Thomas E. Eble and Ross R. HerrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
- Application of Gordon Henry Cook and Peter Arnold MerigoldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Application of Janis RobinsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
3Cited by22 opinions
- In Re Miguel F. Brana, Jose M.C. Berlanga, Marina M. Moset, Erich Schlick and Gerhard KeilhauerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- In re SmithCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- In Re Joyce A. CortrightCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- In re GardnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- In Re Karl Ziegler and Heinz MartinCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.