Legal Opinion
In re Gardner
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided April 5, 1973No. Patent Appeal No. 8923PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARKEY, Chief Judge.
This appeal is from the decision of the Board of Appeals, affirming the rejection under the first paragraph of 35 U.S.C. § 112 of claim 2 of appellant’s application, serial No. 679,670, filed November 1, 1967, for “Guanidinoalkylbenzodioxan Derivatives.”1 We reverse.
THE INVENTION
The application is directed to a class of guanidinoalkyl-l:4-benzodioxan compounds which are useful as antihypertensive agents. Claim 2 reads:
2. A compound selected from the group consisting of a base of the formula:
and a nontoxic, pharmaceutically acceptable acid addition salt thereof, wherein Rr…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Application of Alfred Marzocchi and Richard C. HortonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Application of Gordon Henry Cook and Peter Arnold MerigoldCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- Application of Jean Clement Louis FoucheCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
- In re AndersonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
3Cited by22 opinions
- Enzo Biochem, Inc. v. Gen-Probe Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- In re WertheimCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1976
- In re SmithCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1973
- Standard Oil Company v. MontedisonDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1980
- In re EdwardsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1978
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.