Legal Opinion
Application of Alfred Marzocchi and Richard C. Horton
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided April 15, 1971No. Patent Appeal 8431PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BALDWIN, Judge.
This is an appeal from the decision of the Patent Office Board of Appeals which affirmed the final rejection of claims 5 and' 11 of appellants’ application 1 under 35 U.S.C. § 103 as unpatentable in view of Werner 2 and of claims 6 and 12 under 35 U.S.C. § 112 as being based on an inadequate disclosure. Claims 4 and 10 stand allowed.
THE INVENTION
The subject matter of the claims on appeal involves a technique for improving the adhesion characteristics between glass fibers and vinyl polymer resins. Claim 5 is representative and reads as follows:
5. In the combination of glass…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re ChilowskyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1956
- 26 soc.sec.rep.ser. 284, Medicare&medicaid Gu 37,957 Hoodkroft Convalescent Center, Inc. v. State of New Hampshire, Division of Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Application of Joseph Francis SkrivanCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1970
3Cited by43 opinions
- Walter C. Fiers v. Michel Revel and Pierre Tiollais v. Haruo Sugano, Masami Muramatsu and Tadatsugu TaniguchiCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- In Re Stephen E. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- In Re Mark A. Vaeck, Wipa Chungjatupornchai and Lee McIntoshCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- In re HoganCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
- In Re Miguel F. Brana, Jose M.C. Berlanga, Marina M. Moset, Erich Schlick and Gerhard KeilhauerCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.