Legal Opinion
In Re Miguel F. Brana, Jose M.C. Berlanga, Marina M. Moset, Erich Schlick and Gerhard Keilhauer
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided March 30, 1995No. 93-1393PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PLAGER, Circuit Judge. ■
Miguel F. Brana, et al. (applicants), appeal the March 19, 1993 decision of the United States Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (Board), in Appeal No. 92-1196. The Board affirmed the examiner’s rejection of claims 10-13 of patent application Serial No. 533,944 under 35 U.S.C. § 112 ¶ 1 (1988). 1 The examiner’s rejection, upon which the Board relied in rendering its decision, was based specifically on a challenge to the utility of the claimed compounds and the amount of experimentation necessary to use the compounds. We conclude…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- In Re Donaldson Company, IncCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1994
- In Re Jack E. Caveney and Roy A. MoodyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1985
- In Re Baxter Travenol LabsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- In Re Francis J.A.M.C. De Blauwe and Frank K.A. SelleslagsCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Dickinson v. ZurkoSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- Superior Fireplace Company v. The Majestic Products Company and Vermont Castings, Inc., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Icon Health and Fitness, Inc. v. Strava, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2017
- In Re James C. NapierCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.