Legal Opinion

State v. Torres

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided December 31, 1984No. 14574PublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Judge.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to reduce a sentence under I.C.R. 35. The motion was submitted by Robert Torres after he received an indeterminate sentence of twenty-four years for rape. On appeal he has presented two sets of issues: (1) whether the sentence was excessive and was entered upon an inadequate presentence report; (2) whether the judge who denied the Rule 35 motion abused his discretion by refusing to modify the sentence and by refusing to consider a social worker’s report offered in support of the motion. For reasons explained below, we reject…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. State v. LopezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  3. United States v. Ersel StollingsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
  4. United States v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
  5. State v. ArambulaIdaho Supreme Court · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. Murray v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Hassett v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. State v. ChapmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Evans v. Sawtooth PartnersIdaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Matter of Estate of KunzlerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API