Legal Opinion

State v. Arambula

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1976No. 12001PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFADDEN, Chief Justice.

Defendant Roy Arambula was charged by information with two counts of delivery of a controlled substance (cocaine), and with one count of possession of a controlled substance (cocaine). These charges all constitute felonies. I.C. §§ 37-2732(a) (1) (A), 2732(c)(1). He pleaded guilty to all counts. A presentence investigation report was prepared and submitted to the court. 1

At the sentencing hearing the trial court inquired if the defendant had seen the presentence report, and was advised he had seen it. Defendant’s counsel called attention to an incorrect item in the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. MooreIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State v. OgataIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
  3. State v. GishIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  4. Fairchild v. OlsenIdaho Supreme Court · 1974

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. State v. LopezIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. State v. FordeIdaho Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. State v. LavyIdaho Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State v. BeamIdaho Supreme Court · 1988
  5. State v. BybeeIdaho Court of Appeals · 1989

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API