United States v. Smith
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
CHOY, Circuit Judge:
Appellants were convicted of various crimes and sentenced in the district court for the district of Oregon between June 1976 and January 1979. All filed timely Motions for Reduction of Sentence pursuant to Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 35, which authorizes a sentencing judge to reduce a criminal sentence within 120 days from the date the sentence becomes final. The district court did not respond until May 1980, when, after unexplained delays ranging from 12 months to 42 months, it denied each of the motions.
In this consolidated appeal, appellants argue that the long…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. AddonizioSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Ersel StollingsCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Santiago Mario MendozaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Santiago Mario MendozaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Wayne Wilburn MaynardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- State Bar of Nevada v. ClaiborneNevada Supreme Court · 1988
- United States v. Gordon WalgrenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- United States v. Harry E. ClaiborneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Alfred B. Diggs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
- In Re Victoria Johnston Laurain, Debtor. David G. Rogers, Trustee v. Victoria Johnston LaurainCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.