Legal Opinion

Brick v. A. I. Namm & Sons, Inc.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided February 3, 1927PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INCH, District Judge.

This is a suit brought upon letters patent No. 1,553,993 (United States), dated September 15, 1925, to William R. Delaney; application filed May 11,1923. The patent covers a millinery box, and was duly assigned to the plaintiffs. The technical defendant is a large department store. The real defendant is a competitor of plaintiffs in the millinery box trade.

Delaney’s- patent states that his invention “is to cause a mechanical co-operative functioning between a completely encircling flange provided on a lid and the open top body portion of a box of this construction (cheap…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Diamond Rubber Co. of New York v. Consolidated Rubber Tire Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Atlantic Works v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. Hailes v. Van WormerSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  5. Keystone Manufacturing Co. v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Kelley v. CoeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1938
  2. Condenser Development Corp. v. Montgomery Ward & Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1936
  3. (PC) Vernon v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.District Court, E.D. California · 2024
  4. (PS) Burton v. DarbyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
  5. (PS) Gamboa v. Greyhound Bus Lines, Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 2024

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API