Legal Opinion

Condenser Development Corp. v. Montgomery Ward & Co.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided July 23, 1936No. 7430PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

INCH, District Judge.

Plaintiff sues for alleged infringement of a patent granted to Cramer, No. 1,800,-719, April 14, 1931, and also a patent granted to Tompkins, No. 1,932,328, October 24, 1933.

The Cramer patent relates to an electrical condenser and the Tompkins patent relates to a frame construction of such a condenser. Plaintiff sues on claims 4, 11, 17, and 18 of the Cramer patent, which more specifically relates to a ball-bearing construction, and claim 20, which relates to a stator support.

As to the Tompkins patent plaintiff sues on claims 1, 4, and 5.

The above claims are as follows:

Cra…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brick v. A. I. Namm & Sons, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1927
  2. Allied Metal Stamping Co. v. Standard Electric Equipment Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1932
  3. Kay Jewelry Co. v. Gruen National Watch Case Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. General Instrument CorporationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1949
  2. Condenser Development Corp. v. Davega-City Radio, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API