Legal Opinion
O'Connor v. State Teachers' Retirement System
California Court of Appeal
Decided March 28, 1996No. Docket Nos. B082583, B083642PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ALDRICH, J.
Introduction
These two consolidated appeals involve the calculation of retirement allowance for a member of the State Teachers’ Retirement System (STRS) who holds two full-time teaching positions simultaneously. Both actions arose after the member-teachers filed petitions for writ of administrative mandate pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5.
In the first lawsuit, L. Edmund Kellogg requested an administrative hearing after the STRS Board informed him it had calculated his retirement benefits based on one of his two full-time positions only and considered the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. PietersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Betts v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- California Teachers Assn. v. CoryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Quintana v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Medical Board v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Baxter v. Cal. State Teachers' Ret. Sys., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Molina v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Cable v. State Ex Rel. Employers Insurance Co. of NevadaNevada Supreme Court · 2006
- Lazan v. County of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.