Legal Opinion
Lazan v. County of Riverside
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 16, 2006No. E038572PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GAUT, J.
1. Introduction
After plaintiff Michele Lazan was injured while on duty as a deputy sheriff for the County of Riverside (the County), she unsuccessfully filed an application for disability retirement. She later requested that the County file an application for disability retirement on her behalf under Government Code section 21153. When the County refused, Lazan filed a petition for writ of administrative mandate in the superior court. The court found that the County effectively separated Lazan when it found that her disability prevented her from being able to perform her job…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Drummey v. State Board of Funeral Directors & EmbalmersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Rodriguez v. SolisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
- Great Western Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973
- Boyd v. City of Santa AnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Haywood v. American River Fire Protection DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Taylor v. Nabors Drilling USA, LPCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- People v. ShrierCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL PEACE OFFICERS ASSN. v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Riverside Sheriffs' Ass'n v. County of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Riverside Sheriffs' Ass'n v. County of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.