Legal Opinion
Molina v. Board of Administration
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 29, 2011No. B222370PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*56Opinion
CROSKEY, J.
Phillip Molina (Molina) appeals from a judgment denying his petition for a writ of mandate (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5). By that petition, Molina had sought to compel the inclusion in the calculation of his retirement pension all, or at least some portion of, the settlement proceeds received in the negotiated resolution of his wrongful termination action against the City of Oxnard. Because we agree with the trial court that (1) given the explicit language of the integrated settlement agreement between Molina and the City of Oxnard, the settlement proceeds constitute neither…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Bixby v. PiernoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
- Strumsky v. San Diego County Employees Retirement Assn.California Supreme Court · 1974
- Topanga Assn. for a Scenic Comm. v. CTY OF LOS ANGELESCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Fukuda v. City of AngelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
- Ventura County Deputy Sheriffs' Ass'n v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- City of Pleasanton v. Board of Administration of Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Baxter v. Cal. State Teachers' Ret. Sys., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Young v. City of CoronadoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
- Beckley v. Bd. Of Admin CalPERS CA1/4California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Tanner v. Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.