Legal Opinion
O'Connor v. City & County of San Francisco
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 28, 1949No. Civ. No. 13921PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBray, J.
After judgment for defendant in an action for the death of a person struck by a San Francisco streetcar, plaintiffs appealed. They also attempted to appeal from the order denying their motion for new trial. No such appeal lies.
Plaintiffs, son and daughter of the deceased, sue individually and as administrators with the will annexed of her estate.
Grounds of Appeal
1. Insufficiency of the evidence. 2. Erroneous instructions. 3. Prejudicial misconduct of defense counsel.
*6291. Evidence
The evidence clearly shows the negligence of the motorman operating the streetcar. It also clearly shows the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Girdner v. Union Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
- Douglas v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1928
- Cope v. DavisonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- O'Connor v. United R.R. of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Will v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1941
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Yandell v. National Fireproofing Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Taylor v. Luxor Cab Co.California Court of Appeal · 1952
- Rangel v. BadolatoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Larson v. HollandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Smith v. H. E. Anning Co.California Court of Appeal · 1958