Larson v. Holland
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtBarnard, P. J.
These are appeals from the judgments in two actions arising out of the same accident, which were consolidated for trial.
Three automobiles were involved in the accident. One was owned by Mrs. Larson and driven by Mrs. Haworth. Both were injured. Another was owned by Merkley-Austin Mortuary, Inc. and driven by Mr. Sharp, who was also injured. It was stipulated that Sharp was an employee of the corporation and acting as such at the time. The third car was owned by Mr. Hughes and operated by Miss Holland, who was alone in the car at the time and was not injured. For convenience, these cars will…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- White v. DavisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Hoy v. TornichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Shuey v. AsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- Perbost v. San Marino Hall-SchoolCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Ohran v. the County of YoloCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Scott v. MacKeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Goldsmith v. MillsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
- Bogner v. EubanksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955