Legal Opinion
Pulla v. Amoco Oil Co.
District Court, S.D. Iowa
Decided November 9, 1994No. 4:91-cv-90085PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER DENYING AMOCO’S MOTIONS FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW, AND FOR NEW TRIAL OR REMITTITUR
BENNETT, District Judge.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND AND INTRODUCTION.845
A. Introduction.845
B. Summary Of Facts.847
C. Amoco’s Challenge To The Jury Verdict .847
D. Chart Of Issues, Waivers, And Disposition On The Merits.848
II. ANALYSIS.850
A. Preservation Of Errors.850
1. Preservation Of Error And Rule 50 Motions.851
a. Reassertion Of A Rule 50 Motion.852
b. Lack Of Reassertion Of Amoco’s Rule 50 Motion.855
2. Objections To Jury Instructions.856
a. Necessity, Purpose, And…
2Cases cited293 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Larry Bonner v. City of Prichard, AlabamaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1981
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Palmer v. HoffmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Time, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
288 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Thaddeus C. Pulla, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Amoco Oil Company, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
- Ali v. Douglas Cable CommunicationsDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- Sundt Corp. v. State Ex Rel. South Dakota Department of TransportationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Schuchart v. La Taberna Del Alabardero, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Fischer v. HooperSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.