Legal Opinion

State v. Clopten

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 2009No. 20080631PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Chief Justice:

INTRODUCTION

T1 Defendant, Deon Lomax Clopten, appeals his conviction for murder on grounds that the trial court abused its discretion when it excluded expert testimony regarding the reliability of eyewitness identification. Following existing Utah precedent, the court of appeals affirmed Clopten's conviction while inviting this court to revisit our position on the admissibility of such expert testimony. We reverse the decision of the court of appeals, vacate the conviction, and remand for a new trial.

BACKGROUND

1 2 In February 2006, Clopten was convict, ed of first-degree…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. Melvin TelfaireCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
  3. United States v. Michael G. Thevis, Alton Bart Hood, Global Industries, Inc., Anna Jeanette EvansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. State v. ChappleArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  5. People v. McDonaldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Perry v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
  2. State v. HendersonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2011
  3. Commonwealth v. WalkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  4. State v. MaestasUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  5. State v. Lawson/JamesOregon Supreme Court · 2012

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API