Legal Opinion

Reid v. Keator

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1934No. 6143PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KOELSCH, D. J.

The two above-entitled actions were by the trial court consolidated, tried as one action and determined by one judgment.

They were brought by the plaintiff, W. A. Atkin, against the appellant R. I. Keator for the purpose of establishing plaintiff’s ownership of certain lands, and of certain leases on Indian lands, all situate in Boundary county, Idaho.

The plaintiff also asked that a trust be declared in his favor as to said leases, and as to any of said lands the title whereof is held by the said defendant or for which the contract of purchase runs in the defendant’s name; that…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. McCoy v. McCoySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
  2. Davenport v. BurkeIdaho Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Botsford v. Van RiperNevada Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Chambers v. EmeryUtah Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Cassidy v. GouldSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Naccarato v. Village of Priest RiverIdaho Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Evans v. EvansIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Donndelinger v. DonndelingerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Cazier v. Economy Cash Stores, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Benjamin Funk and Betty Lou Funk v. Ward Tifft D/B/A the Tifft Agency and Pendor-Idaho CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API