Legal Opinion
Taylor v. Brindley
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided December 1, 1947No. 3459PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Circuit Judge.
The appellant, H. H. Taylor, sued the appellee, Ethel M. Brindley, to quiet the title to an oil and gas lease covering fifteen acres of royalty under described land in Oklahoma County. The issues before the trial court, as shaped by the pleadings, stipulations and pre-trial conference, were (1) whether a mineral deed executed by Brindley to one Stinchcomb, when coa strued together with a contemporaneous contract, authorized him to execute the oil and gas lease in question without the consent of Brindley; and (2) if not, did the appellee subsequently ratify the lease; or…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Earp v. Mid-Continent Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Daniel v. TolonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Howard v. ManningSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- ætna Life Ins. Co. v. KeplerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- Ocdike v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Edwards v. HarrisWyoming Supreme Court · 1964
- Teel v. Public Service Co. of OklahomaSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1987
- Willson v. Superior Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
- De Mik v. CargillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1971
- Frankfort Oil Company, a Division of Carstairs Bros. Distilling Company, Inc., a Foreign Corporation v. W. F. SnakardCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1960
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.