Legal Opinion

In re Apple & AT & TM Antitrust Litigation

District Court, N.D. California

Decided December 1, 2011No. C 07-05152 JWPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING MIOTIONS TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND GRANTING MOTIONS TO DE-CERTIFY CLASS

JAMES WARE, Chief Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

In this case, Plaintiffs are purchasers of Apple iPhones and subscribers to cellular service from AT & T Mobility (“ATTM”). Plaintiffs allege that Apple, Inc. (“Apple”) and ATTM entered into an undisclosed agreement under which the two companies agreed that for a period of time, all iPhones sold by Apple would be configured so that purchasers in the United States would be required to sign a cellular service agreement with ATTM. Plaintiffs allege that although they were…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Phillips v. Sprint PCSCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  2. Zack Ward v. Apple, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  3. Operation: Heroes, Ltd. v. Procter & Gamble Productions, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2012
  4. Soto v. American Honda Motor Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
  5. In re Apple iPhone Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API