In re Apple & AT & TM Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING MIOTIONS TO COMPEL ARBITRATION AND GRANTING MOTIONS TO DE-CERTIFY CLASS
JAMES WARE, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
In this case, Plaintiffs are purchasers of Apple iPhones and subscribers to cellular service from AT & T Mobility (“ATTM”). Plaintiffs allege that Apple, Inc. (“Apple”) and ATTM entered into an undisclosed agreement under which the two companies agreed that for a period of time, all iPhones sold by Apple would be configured so that purchasers in the United States would be required to sign a cellular service agreement with ATTM. Plaintiffs allege that although they were…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Phillips v. Sprint PCSCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Zack Ward v. Apple, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Operation: Heroes, Ltd. v. Procter & Gamble Productions, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2012
- Soto v. American Honda Motor Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2012
- In re Apple iPhone Antitrust LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.