Legal Opinion
Zack Ward v. Apple, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 29, 2015No. 12-17805PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge MILAN D. SMITH, JR.; Dissent by Judge WALLACE.
OPINION
M. SMITH, Circuit Judge:
Zack Ward and Thomas Buchar (Plaintiffs) filed a putative class action against Apple Inc. (Apple), alleging that Apple conspired with AT & T Mobility (ATTM) to violate federal antitrust laws. The Plaintiffs’ claims relate to Apple’s exclusivity agreement with ATTM that ATTM would be the exclusive provider of voice and data services for Apple’s iPhone. The Plaintiffs appeal from the district court’s order dismissing their claims under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 19 for failure to join ATTM as a…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Blonder-Tongue Laboratories, Inc. v. University of Illinois FoundationSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Lawlor v. National Screen Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Concha v. LondonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Temple v. Synthes Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Northrop Corp. v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Joyce McKiver v. Murphy-Brown, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- Anna Galaza v. Chad WolfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Helix Inv. Mgmt., LP v. Privilege Direct Corp.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2019
- In re Disposable Contact Lens AntitrustDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2016
- Tabitha Sperring v. Llr, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.