Legal Opinion

Soto v. American Honda Motor Co.

District Court, N.D. California

Decided October 3, 2012No. C 12-1377 SIPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION

SUSAN ILLSTON, District Judge.

Defendant American Honda Motor Co., Inc. (“AHM”) filed a motion to compel arbitration and stay proceedings as to plaintiff Vince Eagen. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument. See Civil Local Rule 7 — 1(b). Having considered the parties’ papers and the evidentiary record, the Court hereby DENIES defendant’s motion.

BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs Vince Eagen and Alex Soto current or former owners of 2008 Honda Accord automobiles manufactured by defendant AHM. Plaintiffs allege that the vehicles…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Cobarruviaz v. Maplebear, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2015
  2. AbbVie Inc. v. Adcentrx Therapeutics Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2025
  3. Chen v. BMW of North America, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
  4. Cobb v. Resurgent Capital Services, LPDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 2021
  5. Ensambles Hyson, S.A de C.V. v. SanchezDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2024

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API