Legal Opinion
In re Apple iPhone Antitrust Litigation
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 11, 2012No. C 11-06714 JWPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION; GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DISMISS
JAMES WARE, Chief Judge.
*892 I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiffs1 bring this putative class action against Apple, Inc. (“Defendant”) alleging violations of Section 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 2. Plaintiffs allege that Defendant violated the Sherman Act by conspiring with non-party AT & T Mobility, LLC (“ATTM”) to monopolize an alleged aftermarket for voice and data services for iPhones, and also by monopolizing or attempting to monopolize an alleged aftermarket for software…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Arthur Andersen LLP v. CarlisleSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Jessica Kramer v. Toyota Motor CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Commonwealth v. MartinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2014
- Zack Ward v. Apple, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Hedgepath v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 2014
- Scheurer v. Fromm Family Foods LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.