Legal Opinion

Neiderhiser v. Henry's Drive-In, Inc.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1964No. 7346, 7667PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STRUCKMEYER, Justice.

Appellant, Robert Neiderhiser, appeals from a judgment entered on the pleadings in favor of appellee, Henry’s Drive-In, Inc., defendant below.

Appellant sued in two counts. Count one demanded the return of money paid to the appellee under two contracts executed by the parties. Count two sought damages for appellee’s alleged representation to appellant at the time of entering into the contract that appellee was qualified to transact business in Arizona. Appellant moved the lower court for summary judgment and appellee moved for a judgment on the pleadings. The lower court…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Young v. BishopArizona Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Friedlander Bros. v. DealSupreme Court of Alabama · 1928
  3. Monaghan & Murphy Bank v. DavisArizona Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Meloy v. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Worcester Felt Pad Corporation v. Tucson Airport AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Walter E. Heller & Co. of California v. StephensNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Pepper & Tanner, Inc. v. Shamrock Broadcasting, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
  3. Cowley v. Braden Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  4. Rochester Capital Leasing Corporation v. SpragueCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1970
  5. Storwal International, Inc. v. Thom Rock Realty Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1992

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API