Legal Opinion

Friedlander Bros. v. Deal

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 14, 1928No. 4 Div. 363PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The decisive and, indeed, the only question presented by this appeal is whether a foreign mercantile corporation, organized and chartered to do a merchandising business, and authorized to buy, lease, or hold real estate suitable to the purposes of the corporation, may lawfully lease for its intended use in its future business in Alabama a storehouse in Alabama, without first complying with the laws of Alabama imposing certain conditions, requirements, and restrictions upon foreign corporations "before engaging in or transacting any business in this state." Code 1923, §§ 7209-7220.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Farrior v. New England Mortgage Security Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1889
  2. Beard v. Union & American Publishing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1881
  3. Sullivan v. Sullivan Timber Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
  4. Alabama Western Railroad v. Talley-Bates Const. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  5. George M. Muller Manufacturing Co. v. First National BankSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. Hall Auto Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1933
  2. St. Mary’s Oil Engine Co v. Jackson Ice & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1931
  3. State v. Southern Natural Gas CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 1936
  4. Worcester Felt Pad Corporation v. Tucson Airport AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
  5. Franklin Life Ins. Co. v. WardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API