Legal Opinion

Walter E. Heller & Co. of California v. Stephens

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 1968No. 8393PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOISE, Justice.

Plaintiff-appellant, hereinafter referred to as “Heller,” is a California corporation. It brought this action to recover amounts claimed to be due from defendants-appellees, hereinafter referred to as defendants, citizens of New Mexico, on a “lease” agreement executed by them with Tri-County Leasing Corporation, hereinafter referred to as “Tri-County,” a California corporation, and by Tri-County assigned to Heller. '■ 'The record discloses that defendants contracted with Dynamics Research, Inc., in .Arizona, for the manufacture of a custom-built mill for use at a mine…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. International Textbook Co. v. PiggSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Union Brokerage Co. v. JensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  3. Butler Bros. Shoe Co. v. United States Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
  4. Eli Lilly & Co. v. Sav-On-Drugs, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Chattanooga National Building & Loan Ass'n v. DensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Federal Deposit Insurance v. HiattNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Goodwin Brothers Leasing, Inc. v. NousisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
  3. Riblet Tramway Company, Incorporated v. Monte Verde Corporation, and Angel Fire Ski CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  4. Cessna Finance Corp. v. Mesilla Valley Flying Service, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Flemma v. Halliburton Energy Servs., Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 2013

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API