Legal Opinion
Monaghan & Murphy Bank v. Davis
Arizona Supreme Court
Decided March 27, 1925No. Civil No. 2223PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.
— In February, 1921, S. N. Craves and wife were indebted to Monaghan & Murphy Bank, a corporation, hereinafter called the plaintiff, in the snm of $4,600. This indebtedness was secured by a chattel mortgage on certain cattle in Mohave county, Arizona. Craves sold the cattle to Ceorge W. Davis, and the latter desired, to make arrangements with plaintiff to assume the indebtedness of the Craves.’
Plaintiff is a California corporation, with its principal place of business in Needles, California, and about February 23d, Davis went to Needles to see plaintiff about the assumption of the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Martin v. Bankers' Trust Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1916
- Babbitt v. FieldArizona Supreme Court · 1898
- Eastern Building & Loan Ass'n v. BedfordU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee · 1898
- Nicolai v. Sugarman Iron & Metal Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1922
- United States Savings & Loan Co. v. ShainNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- National Union Indemnity Co. v. Bruce Bros.Arizona Supreme Court · 1934
- L. M. White Contracting Co. v. St. Joseph Structural Steel Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1971
- Ranch House Supply Corporation v. Van SlykeArizona Supreme Court · 1962
- Riblet Tramway Company, Incorporated v. Monte Verde Corporation, and Angel Fire Ski CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
- Worcester Felt Pad Corporation v. Tucson Airport AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.