Legal Opinion

Svedlund v. Municipality of Anchorage

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided October 28, 1983No. 7581PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Before BRYNER, C.J., and COATS and SINGLETON, JJ. SINGLETON, Judge.

On November 1, 1982, Lee G. Svedlund was arrested for driving while intoxicated, AMC 9.28.020(A), refusal to submit to a breathalyzer, AMC 9.28.022(C), 1 and resist ing an officer, AMC 8.05.530(a). Svedlund was read a standard implied consent warning informing him that sanctions, including loss of his driver’s license, could be imposed for refusing to submit to a breathalyzer. In addition, he was informed that refusal to submit to a breathalyzer was a misdemean- or. Svedlund was not advised of his Miranda rights, nor…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. South Dakota v. NevilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. State v. EricksonAlaska Supreme Court · 1978

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Romo v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
  2. Cox v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  3. Burnett v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1984
  4. Mogard v. City of LaramieWyoming Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Gundersen v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1988

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API