Legal Opinion

Romo v. Municipality of Anchorage

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided April 12, 1985No. A-462PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SINGLETON, Judge.

Ron D. Romo pled nolo contendere and was convicted of refusal to submit to a chemical breath test for alcohol. AMC 9.28.022(C). With the consent of the prosecutor and the court, Romo reserved his right to appeal three issues to this court: (1) that his arrest resulted from an illegal investigatory stop, precluding use in evidence of his refusal to submit to a breathalyzer examination; (2) that Anchorage Municipal Code § 9.28.021 (implied consent to a chemical test) is unconstitutionally vague; and (3) that he was denied the right to counsel after his arrest when he…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  3. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
  4. Colautti v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Cooksey v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Ozhuwan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1990
  2. Effenbeck v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
  3. Brosan v. CochranCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  4. State v. MechamWashington Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Russell v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API