Romo v. Municipality of Anchorage
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SINGLETON, Judge.
Ron D. Romo pled nolo contendere and was convicted of refusal to submit to a chemical breath test for alcohol. AMC 9.28.022(C). With the consent of the prosecutor and the court, Romo reserved his right to appeal three issues to this court: (1) that his arrest resulted from an illegal investigatory stop, precluding use in evidence of his refusal to submit to a breathalyzer examination; (2) that Anchorage Municipal Code § 9.28.021 (implied consent to a chemical test) is unconstitutionally vague; and (3) that he was denied the right to counsel after his arrest when he…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
- Colautti v. FranklinSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cooksey v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Ozhuwan v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1990
- Effenbeck v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
- Brosan v. CochranCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- State v. MechamWashington Supreme Court · 2016
- Russell v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.