Burnett v. Municipality of Anchorage
Court of Appeals of Alaska
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SINGLETON, Judge.
Peter G. Burnett pled no contest to a charge of refusing a breathalyzer test. AMC 9.28.022(C). With the approval of the court and the prosecutor he reserved the right to appeal the rejection of his constitutional challenges to the ordinance. We therefore have jurisdiction of this appeal. Oveson v. Anchorage, 574 P.2d 801, 803 (Alaska 1978); Cooksey v. State, 524 P.2d 1251, 1257 (Alaska 1974).
*1365Burnett challenges the ordinance on its face, alleging that it violates the state and federal constitutions. He concedes that we rejected the same arguments in Svedlund v.…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. PlaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brown v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Michigan v. DeFillippoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. DionisioSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Pooley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1985
- State v. HooverOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Furman v. SheppardCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2000
- McCormick v. Municipality of AnchorageCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2000
- McCracken v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.