Legal Opinion

United States v. Hines

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided December 22, 1986No. 50,825; ACM 24002PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

COX, Judge:

This appeal involves the interrelationship between the Confrontation Clause of the Sixth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States and the evidentiary rules regarding the admissibility of hearsay statements. Here we hold that certain out-of-court statements were properly admitted in evidence, but others were not. The facts and the case history of the instant appeal may be succinctly stated.

I

Appellant had two stepdaughters, “A” and “B,” ages 14 and 18 respectively.1 A general court-martial with members convicted appellant of numerous sex offenses against…

2Cases cited55 opinions

  1. Bruton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Chambers v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

50 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. United States v. PollardUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1993
  2. United States v. ArnoldUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  3. United States v. GiambraUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1991
  4. United States v. MorenoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1992
  5. United States v. McGrathUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1994

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API