United States v. McGrath
United States Court of Military Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
COX, Judge:
At his trial, appellant, through various legal maneuvers, attempted to block the victim from testifying at the court-martial. Failing that, when offered the opportunity to cross-examine her, he declined. On this appeal, he now argues he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to be confronted by the victim at trial. As a result of this alleged denial, he contends that two of the victim’s out-of-court statements should have been ruled inadmissible.1 The exclusion of those statements, in turn, would leave his own pretrial confession “uncorroborated” — and thus…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- United States v. KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. UretaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
- United States v. CarruthersCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
- United States v. WellingtonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
- United States v. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.