Legal Opinion

United States v. McGrath

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided May 6, 1994No. 68,260; CMR No. 28358PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

COX, Judge:

At his trial, appellant, through various legal maneuvers, attempted to block the victim from testifying at the court-martial. Failing that, when offered the opportunity to cross-examine her, he declined. On this appeal, he now argues he was denied his Sixth Amendment right to be confronted by the victim at trial. As a result of this alleged denial, he contends that two of the victim’s out-of-court statements should have been ruled inadmissible.1 The exclusion of those statements, in turn, would leave his own pretrial confession “uncorroborated” — and thus…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. California v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. United States v. KelleyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  2. United States v. UretaCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1996
  3. United States v. CarruthersCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2007
  4. United States v. WellingtonCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2003
  5. United States v. GrantCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API