Madrin v. . R. R.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
This is an action for actionable negligence instituted by plaintiff against the defendants, alleging damage. The defendants deny negligence and set up the plea of contributory negligence.
The Sinclair Refining Company, further answering, says: "That in the event the jury should find that the plaintiff's injuries were in any wise caused by the negligence of the defendants, which this answering defendant denies, then this answering defendant alleges and says: That the negligence of its codefendant, the Norfolk Southern Railroad Company, was the proximate cause of the plaintiff's said injuries.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Moseley v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Butner v. Atlantic & Yadkin Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Harris v. Black Mountain Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Collett v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Scoggins v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
3Cited by6 opinions
- Campbell v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Keller v. . R.R. and Davis v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Sanders v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Keller v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- Campbell v. High Point, Thomasville & Denton RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.