Legal Opinion

Keller v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 11, 1933PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

These are actions for actionable negligence alleging damages. The plaintiff, Phillip Keller, instituted this action in the Superior Court of Madison County, against ’the Southern Eailway Company, on 19 July, 1932, and filed his complaint, alleging two causes of action. In his first cause of action he alleges that he was operating an automobile truck and drove upon the track of the defendant, Southern Eailway Company, in the town of Hot Springs, and was struck and injured, and demands judgment in the sum of $2,650. In his second cause of action he alleges that his truck was demolished by…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. White v. Carolina Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
  2. Albritton v. . HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Moseley v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  4. Bagwell v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  5. Campbell v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bagwell v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
  2. Texas Mexican R. Co. v. BunnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953
  3. Cline v. Southern Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1940
  4. Earnhardt v. Southern Railway Co.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1968
  5. Texas Mexican R. Co. v. BunnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API