Butner v. Atlantic & Yadkin Railway Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.
It is not contended by tbe learned counsel for tbe ap-pellee in this appeal tbat there was no evidence at tbe trial of this action in tbe Superior Court sufficient to sustain tbe allegations in tbe complaint to tbe effect tbat plaintiff was injured by tbe negligence of defendant, as alleged therein. Tbe contention is tbat tbe evidence offered by tbe plaintiff, considered in tbe light most favorable to him, shows tbat be contributed to bis injuries by bis own negligence, and tbat be is therefore barred of recovery in this action. Tbe principle upon wbicb this contention is made is well settled…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Harrison v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
- Coleman v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
- Trull v. Seaboard Air Line Railway Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1909
- Holton v. Kinston-Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Godwin v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Lincoln v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Eller v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
- Benton v. Hillcrest Foods, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1999
- Hayes v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.