Keller v. . R.R. and Davis v. . R. R.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1DissentBrogden, J.
The complaint of plaintiff in Keller v. Railway Co., is as follows:
"For a first cause of action, the plaintiff, complaining of the defendant, says:
1. That the defendant is a corporation created and existing under the laws of the State of Virginia, and as such is authorized to do business in the county and state aforesaid as a common carrier of freight and passengers for hire.
2. That plaintiff is a citizen and resident of the county of Madison, State of North Carolina.
3. That at the time hereinafter mentioned the defendant as such daily operated approximately twenty-five trains over its track…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- White v. Carolina Realty Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
- Albritton v. . HillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
- Moseley v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Bagwell v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Campbell v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Lincoln v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- Thomas v. Motor LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Sebastian v. Horton Motor LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938
- Harper v. . Harper and Wickham v. . HarperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Harper v. HarperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.