Nichols v. Champion Fibre Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.
Tbe jury by its verdict has found tbat plaintiff was not injured by tbe negligence of Setzer or Jones, employees of their co-defendant, Champion Fibre Company. Neither of them is, therefore, liable to plaintiff for damages as alleged in the complaint. The jury has further found, that plaintiff was injured by the negligence of defendant, Champion Fibre Company, as ■ alleged in the complaint. This defendant, upon the verdict, is liable to plaintiff, and the judgment that he recover of the Champion Fibre Company the sum assessed by the jury as his damages must be affirmed, unless the assignments…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Doremus v. RootWashington Supreme Court · 1901
- Bradley v. RosenthalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- New Orleans & Northeastern Railroad v. JopesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Cressler v. BrownSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Farnon v. Silver King Coalition Mines Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Lewis v. . WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
- State v. ArdreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
- Chambers Ex Rel. Chambers v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Williams v. Eastern Carolina Coach Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
- Altman v. SandersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.