Legal Opinion

Farnon v. Silver King Coalition Mines Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided August 30, 1917No. 3025PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Third. District; Hon. T. D. Lewis,- Judge. Action by James Farnon against the Silver King Coalition Mines Company. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtThurman, J.

The respondent, a miner, was severely injured while in the employment of defendant corporation in one of its mines in Park City, Utah. His place of work was on the 600-foot level of what is known as the Alliance Tunnel. His mode of ingress and egress to and from his place of work was by means of a vertical double compartment shaft extending from the 500-foot level downward in which a cage was operated by an engineer - employed by the defendant company. The cage was operated by means of an electric engine controlled and manipulated by the engineer, whose place of work was on the 500-foot…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Union Pac. Ry. Co. v. ArtistCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1894
  2. Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. SullivanIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Eighmy v. Union Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1895
  4. South Florida Railroad v. PriceSupreme Court of Florida · 1893
  5. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fé Railroad v. ZeilerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Ransom v. HanerAlaska Supreme Court · 1961
  2. Gedeon v. East Ohio Gas Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Mouse v. Central Savings & Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Nichols v. Champion Fibre Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  5. Kuchenmeister v. Los Angeles & S. L. R. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1918

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API