Legal Opinion

Chambers Ex Rel. Chambers v. Allen

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 2, 1951No. 597PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.

The defendants except and assign as error the failure of the trial court to sustain their motion for judgments as of nonsuit, made at the close of the plaintiffs’ evidence and renewed at the close of all the evidence.

"We think the evidence introduced in the trial below, when considered in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs, as it must be on motion for judgment as of nonsuit, is sufficient to withstand such motion. Carson v. Doggett, 231 N.C. 629, 58 S.E. 2d 609; Winfield v. Smith, 230 N.C. 392, 53 S.E. 2d 251; Thomas v. Motor Lines, 230 N.C. 122, 52 S.E. 2d 377; Bundy v. Powell, 229…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Bundy v. . PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  2. Lewis v. . WatsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  3. Thomas v. Motor LinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. State v. ArdreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Spencer v. . BrownSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Cowan v. Murrows Transfer, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Childress v. Johnson Motor Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Citizens National Bank v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Hawkins Ex Rel. Hawkins v. SimpsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  5. Brannon v. EllisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API