Legal Opinion
Kenneth McClure Young, II v. Warren Kann and Jane Doe
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided March 5, 1991No. 89-5437PublishedCited by 222 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Circuit Judge.
This civil rights case, brought by a federal prisoner acting pro se, presents for us a first impression question of the due process rights of a prisoner to the production of documentary evidence at a prison disciplinary hearing. Plaintiff Kenneth McClure Young, II, who lost substantial good time credit as the result of two prison disciplinary hearings, brought suit in the district court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania claiming that the disciplinary hearing officer, defendant Warren Kann, violated his due process rights by refusing to produce a…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by222 opinions
- Henry Lavado, Jr. v. Patrick W. KeohaneCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
- Clyde Piggie v. Zettie CottonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2003
- Young v. QuinlanCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
- Burns v. PA Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
- Elizabeth Harvey v. Peter LoftusCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
217 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.