Legal Opinion
Elizabeth Harvey v. Peter Loftus
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided November 27, 2012No. 12-3300UnpublishedCited by 152 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
Elizabeth Harvey, proceeding pro se, appeals an order from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania dismissing her complaint and an order denying her motion to reconsider that dismissal. Because this appeal presents no substantial question, we will summarily affirm the judgment of the District Court.
I
In December 2010, Harvey filed a complaint in the District Court that she amended in March 2011, broadly asserting three claims against Ramani Ayer, Peter Loftus, Judge James M. Munley, Kent Price, and Does 1-5. The claims and defendants were related to a…
3Cases cited21 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by152 opinions
- Tarapchak v. Lackawanna CountyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. v. GulianDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2014
- ANDERSON v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIADistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
- Aaron M. Klingensmith v. Michael Pacek, in his individual and official capacities, et al.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
- Alex Belfi v. Honorable Nina Wright Padilla, Thomas Wagner, LendingClub Bank, N.A., et al.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2025
147 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.