Legal Opinion

State v. McAvoy

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 2009No. 20090024PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice.

[¶ 1] Roger Patrick McAvoy appealed from a criminal judgment entered following a jury trial and verdict finding him guilty of failure to register as a sex offender under N.D.C.C. § 12.1-32-15(2). The criminal judgment indicates McAvoy was convicted by a plea of guilty. This is an error. We affirm the conviction, holding there was sufficient evidence to convict McAvoy of the offense but we direct that on remand the criminal judgment be amended to reflect that McAvoy was convicted after a jury trial and verdict finding him guilty of the offense of failure to register…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. BurrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. State v. WilsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004
  3. State v. IgouNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  4. State v. McAvoyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. NessNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  2. State v. VondalNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. GrantNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
  4. State v. HinojosaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
  5. State v. O'TOOLENorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API