State v. O'TOOLE
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] David O’Toole appeals from a criminal judgment entered upon a jury verdict finding him guilty of reckless endangerment. We affirm, concluding that there is sufficient evidence to support O’Toole’s conviction and that the district court did not err in refusing to give O’Toole’s requested jury instruction.
I
[¶ 2] O’Toole is a police officer with the Grand Forks Police Department and has approximately nine years of law enforcement experience. O’Toole had achieved the rank of master police officer at the time of the incident. He was on duty during the early hours of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- State v. NoorlunNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- Sauby v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. ZajacNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. MeierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1988
- Simon v. SimonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. GrayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
- Filkowski v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. MontplaisirNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. VetterNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- Coppage v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.