State v. Wilson
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMANN, Justice.
[¶ 1] Scott Wilson appeals his judgment of conviction for theft by deception, in violation of N.D.C.C. § 12.1-23-02(2). Wilson argues there was insufficient evidence to sustain the guilty verdict. Wilson also argues the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the definitions of “deception,” “deprive,” and “intent.” We affirm.
I
[¶ 2] Scott Wilson sold meat products door-to-door for Farmer’s Pride, a company with offices in Fargo, North Dakota, and Roseville, Minnesota. C.M., a Mandan, North Dakota, resident, was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease type dementia in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Railway Co. v. McCarthySupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- State v. SteffesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- United States v. Ruth Lee, United States of America v. Michael SandmeyerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003
- State v. MotskoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
- State v. HatchNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- State v. NoorlunNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. DemaraisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. KrullNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. GaddieNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022
- State v. RourkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.