Pacher v. Invisible Fence of Dayton

Brogan, Judge.

{¶ 1} In this case, Andrew Pacher Jr. and Alyce Pacher appeal from the dismissal of claims for negligent infliction of emotional distress brought on behalf of Mr. and Mrs. Pacher, their minor children, Sarah and Andrew III, and the family’s golden retriever, “Boomer.” These claims are based on an injury Boomer allegedly sustained while confined within an “invisible fence” installed by cross-appellant, Invisible Fence of Dayton (“IFD”). After a bench trial, the court awarded a judgment of $1,714.85 against IFD for negligence and breach of contract.

{¶ 2} The Pachers raise the…