Legal Opinion

McDougall v. Lamm

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 31, 2012PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Hoens

In this appeal, we are asked to consider whether a pet owner should be permitted to recover for emotional distress caused by observing the traumatic death of that pet. Asserting that pets have achieved an elevated status that makes them companions in the lives of human beings, plaintiff Joyce McDougall asks this Court to hold that pets should no longer be considered to be mere personal property. With that fundamental shift in the way that pets are seen in the eyes of the law as her backdrop, plaintiff asks *207us to permit her to recover for the emotional distress she endured after she watched…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. Dillon v. LeggCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Hopkins v. Fox & Lazo RealtorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1993
  3. Kelly v. GwinnellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1984
  4. Portee v. JaffeeSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  5. Caputzal v. Lindsay Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1966

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Charlotte Robinson v. Frank Vivirito (072407)Supreme Court of New Jersey · 2014
  2. Ewell v. NBA Properties, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2015
  3. Robert Cardenas, Ashley Cardenas, Savannah Cardenas, and Braylon Cardenas v. Sigiel J. SwansonWyoming Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Moreland v. ParksNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2018
  5. Robert Cardenas, Ashley Cardenas, Savannah Cardenas, and Braylon Cardenas v. Sigiel J. SwansonWyoming Supreme Court · 2023

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API