Davis v. Flickinger
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLundberg Stratton, J.
R.C. 3109.04 requires a finding of a “change in circumstances.” Such a determination when made by a trial judge should not be disturbed, absent an abuse of discretion. In determining whether a change in circumstances has occurred so as to warrant a change in custody, a trial judge, as the trier of fact, must be given wide latitude to consider all issues which support such a change, including a change in circumstances because of a child’s age and *417consequent needs, as well as increased hostility by one parent (and that parent’s spouse) which frustrates cooperation between the parties on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Seasons Coal Co. v. City of ClevelandOhio Supreme Court · 1984
- C. E. Morris Co. v. Foley Construction Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1978
- Miller v. MillerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
- Bechtol v. BechtolOhio Supreme Court · 1990
- Wyss v. WyssOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by474 opinions
- Pacher v. Invisible Fence of DaytonOhio Court of Appeals · 2003
- Davis v. FlickingerOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- In Re A.G.Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
- In re R.M.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
- Fisher v. HasenjagerOhio Supreme Court · 2007
469 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.